submitted by /u/Standard_Stand
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/3cQrT7F
Music & More
submitted by /u/Standard_Stand
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/3cQrT7F
submitted by /u/–DJDISDABEST–
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/2x5lki6
submitted by /u/monolithburger
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/3bFTOqz
submitted by /u/astritmalsia
[link] [comments]
from programming https://ift.tt/3eSCpwH
submitted by /u/gerardta
[link] [comments]
from programming https://ift.tt/2VBeWsj
Do you want a tool that monitor your project directories/files and report you, which files changed and ready to stage/commit?
This is where giti will probably help you:
https://github.com/LinArcX/giti
submitted by /u/linarcx
[link] [comments]
from Linux, GNU/Linux, free software… https://ift.tt/2W0t3q3
I have recently become interested in the web performance side of web development. I’m wondering if the way I’m calculating the amount of time it takes a block of code to run correct and trustworthy?
Essentially what I do is wrap a console.time(), and a console.timeEnd around a block of code like so.
function copyToClipboard1(e) { console.time('Exec #1'); const clipboard = emailInput; clipboard.value = this.value; clipboard.select(); document.execCommand("copy"); console.timeEnd('Exec #1'); }
This then returns something like this Navigator #1:
0.0869140625ms
.
Is this an efficient way of calculating the speed of a code block. The result each time are usually similar enough?
submitted by /u/Deviso
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/2S6lddz
submitted by /u/Doener23
[link] [comments]
from Linux, GNU/Linux, free software… https://ift.tt/3auTRUL
submitted by /u/EvoNext
[link] [comments]
from programming https://ift.tt/3cKqI9v
submitted by /u/ashudeshwal
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/2VzL4N9
submitted by /u/RgbwKeyboard
[link] [comments]
from programming https://ift.tt/2S5xjni
With robust and time-tested tools like synaptic and aptitude, I think apt was doing a great job already, so what was the need for Snap? If the goal was to create one standard packaging system across all distros, then that will only work if all other distros also unanimously adapt Snap but until that happens, upstream developers will have to ship both apt/dnf as well as snap versions of their apps. So, developers’ work has increased or decreased?
submitted by /u/smart_jackal
[link] [comments]
from Linux, GNU/Linux, free software… https://ift.tt/2S34Eza
submitted by /u/that_geek_
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/2y0SgsH
submitted by /u/dayanruben
[link] [comments]
from programming https://ift.tt/3bEm90C
submitted by /u/spurushottam13
[link] [comments]
from ππππππππππ https://ift.tt/2KCqrcF